username

password

image of 4 Paper Buildings logoNew Court Chambersimage of 1 KBW logoCoram ChambersDNA Legal14 Gray's Inn Chambers advert2-3 Hind CourtGarden Court1 Garden Courtsite by Zehuti

Kernott v Jones hearing begins in the Supreme Court today

Supreme Court Justices to review Stack v Dowden

The hearing of the appeal to the Supreme Court in Kernott v Jones [2010] EWCA Civ 578 begins today, 4th May 2011.   The issue to be decided is "whether a court can properly infer an agreement by an unmarried couple, who hold a property in equal shares at the date of their separation, to the effect that thereafter their respective beneficial interests should alter."  The case is being heard by Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe, Lady Hale of Richmond, Lord Collins of Mapesbury, Lord Kerr of Tonaghmore and Sir Nicholas Wilson.

As Rebecca Bailey-Harris and John Wilson QC, both of 1 Hare Court, state in an article published on Family Law Week (Hang on a Minute! (Or is Kernott the new White?)), the fault-lines in the ruling in Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17, have become increasingly apparent. However, in the light of the time-frame in which judgment has been given in recent cases before the Supreme Court they ask what advice should practitioners give in the interim.

The authors say:

"The appeal in Kernott v Jones pending in the Supreme Court presents a very similar dilemma for practitioners attempting to advise cohabitees on the current state of the law affecting their homes.   It is probably unwise and may possibly, in certain circumstances, be negligent for lawyers to advise that a case should proceed to a final hearing when the law is "up for grabs" in this area." 

They also consider that the appeal may pose a dilemma for the Supreme Court itself. Should it, as the highest tribunal, take upon itself the task from which successive governments and the legislature have shied away, namely to take steps to cure the inherent injustices in the system, taking into account changing social conditions?  They ask whether it would it be constitutionally appropriate for the judiciary to undertake such a task, particularly where general public opinion does not appear to favour reform?

The article can be read here.

Readers will also be interested in Kernott v Jones: Asking the Right Questions by Rawdon Crozier, barrister at King's Bench & Godolphin Chambers and a new article published last week on Family Law Week, Fair Outcomes as Common Intentions? The Debate in Kernott v Jones by Dr Robert H. George Senior Law Tutor, Jesus College, University of Oxford.  

The full Supreme Court judgment will be published on Family Law Week as soon as it becomes available.