Judgments

Kremen v Agrest [2010] EWHC 3091

Application to set aside as a sham or pursuant to s 23 Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 two transactions in the context of protracted and complex litigation between the husband, wife and third parties. The first transaction was held to be a sham and the second was set aside under s 23. Mostyn J also considers the piercing of the corporate veil for these purposes.

To view this content you must register

£0

Free Account

  • Access to our news
  • Access to our articles
  • Access to limited podcasts
Register Here

£125pa

Annual Subscription

  • Access to our news
  • Access to our articles
  • Access to limited podcasts
  • CPD Courses
  • Training Webinars
  • Podcasts
Register Here

No track loaded
0:00 / 0:00

Queue