Judgments

Yeoman’s Row Management & Another v Cobbe [2008] UKHL 55

Appeal against decision that a property developer had a proprietary estoppel claim against the owner of a property who changed her mind about the terms of the proposed oral development agreement. The Lords found that the property developer's claim did not constitute propietary estoppel but instead was limited to quantum meriut.

To view this content you must register

£0

Free Account

  • Access to our news
  • Access to our articles
  • Access to limited podcasts
Register Here

£125pa

Annual Subscription

  • Access to our news
  • Access to our articles
  • Access to limited podcasts
  • CPD Courses
  • Training Webinars
  • Podcasts
Register Here

No track loaded
0:00 / 0:00

Queue