M v F and A [2026] EWFC 106 (B)

HHJ Owens considered whether to vary a previous Prohibited Steps Order (PSO) until the child, A, is 18 in order to prevent the father from meeting with or communicating with her, to extend the existing non-molestation order (NMO) until A finishes university and for a Section 91(14) order to last until she is 18.