Home > Judgments

Judgments

The list below is of key judgments published this year. Click the folders on the left hand side to browse the archive of judgments now available on the site since we started publishing in 2005.

• XZ v YZ [2022] EWFC 49 (Fam)
  Judgments (13/06/2022)
  This case concerned an application by H for a Reporting Restriction order (‘RRO’) ahead of a final hearing in W’s application for financial remedies.
• MacDougall v SW & Ors (sperm donor : parental responsibility or contact) [2022] EWFC 50
  Judgments (13/06/2022)
  
• V V v V V [2022] EWFC 46
  Judgments (13/06/2022)
  This judgment concerned the attribution and division of costs following final determination of a W’s needs-based claim in a short and childless marriage.
• E v D [2022] EWHC 1216 (Fam)
  Judgments (13/06/2022)
  MacDonald J made an order for the summary return of a child in 1980 Hague Convention proceedings, holding that the child was habitually resident in Malta on the date of his retention and rejecting the father’s “defences”.
• VV v VV [2022] EWFC 41
  Judgments (26/05/2022)
  Peel J considers the law on the effect of pre-marital cohabitation and engagement on the sharing principle, conduct and the needs principle in a short marriage. He reserved the question of costs.
• G v W [2022] EWHC 1101 (Fam)
  Judgments (26/05/2022)
  Appeal of the lower court’s decision not to award the wife monies to meet her liabilities and child care costs
• H v R & Another [2022] EWHC 1073 (Fam)
  Judgments (23/05/2022)
  Peel J determined jurisdictional issues in respect of two children who have been living with family members in Libya since August 2020.
• B v P [2022] EWFC B18
  Judgments (23/05/2022)
  Successful appeal against the outcome of a fact-finding hearing held before a district judge in private law proceedings.
• Tickle v Herefordshire County Council & Ors [2022] EWHC 1017 (Fam)
  Judgments (23/05/2022)
  The Court was concerned with an application by a journalist, Ms Tickle, relating to care proceedings. The journalist wished to identify and screen an interview with the mother in the care proceedings, Ms Logan, within a BBC Panorama programme in an unanonymised form. The local authority in the care proceedings, Hertfordshire County Council (“HCC”), opposed this, and made a cross application for a Reporting Restriction Order (“RRO”), prohibiting the identification of employees of HCC.
• Re C (A Child)(Fact-finding) [2022] EWCA Civ 584
  Judgments (17/05/2022)
  The Court of Appeal dismissed a father’s appeal against findings in care proceedings where criticisms were made of ABE interviews, and the judge had drawn an adverse inference from the father’s failure to attend court to give evidence.
• M (A Child - Private Law Children Proceedings- Case Management- Intimate Images) [2022] EWHC 986 (Fam)
  Judgments (09/05/2022)
  In private law children proceedings in the High Court, Mrs Justice Knowles made case management decisions about the use of intimate images, which she noted as an issue that is increasingly common when allegations of domestic and/or sexual abuse are made and the court is holding a fact-finding hearing. Importantly, she notes that “Sexually explicit or intimate videos and photographs should not be filed as part of evidence without a written application being made to the court in advance” (para 77).
• Somerset County Council v NHS Somerset Clinical Commissioning Group & Ors [2022] EWFC 31
  Judgments (09/05/2022)
  Guidance on the proper approach where there has been a breach of the medical requirements of the Adoption Agencies Regulations 2005
• Xanthopoulos v Rakshina [2022] EWFC 30
  Judgments (05/05/2022)
  Mostyn J gives reasons for: (a) refusing he husband's application for a further legal services payment order; and (b) Granting the wife’s application to be released from an undertaking that pending determination of the husband's financial claims she would preserve and not deal with, charge or in any way diminish a bank account (credited with £11 million). (c) Refusing to preserve the parties anonymity.
• Griffiths v Tickle & Ors (Re Disclosure by Counsel for Appellant and Application by First Respondent) [2022] EWCA Civ 465
  Judgments (29/04/2022)
  This matter related to a fact-finding judgment in Children Act proceedings. On 30 July 2021 it was determined that the judgment could be published without anonymising the mother and father concerned. On 10 December 2021, the Court of Appeal gave judgment upholding that decision and dismissing the father’s appeal.
• P (Children)(Disclosure) [2022] EWCA Civ 495
  Judgments (29/04/2022)
  Appeal by a father in private law proceedings who had serious findings (including rape of the mother) made against him. Hayden J rejected his application for protection from the possibility of any admissions or incriminating evidence being used in criminal proceedings. The Court of Appeal (Lord Burnett of Maldon CJ, Lord Justice Peter Jackson and Lord Justice Baker) dismissed the appeal.
• Simon v Simon & Level (Joinder) (Rev1) [2022] EWFC 29
  Judgments (25/04/2022)
  Financial remedy proceedings, in which the wife agreed a consent order that prevented her from discharging loans of £1 million owed to a litigation loan funder, and the funder was joined to proceedings. Inconsistent communications between the parties, the intervenor, the allocated judge, and the Court complicated matters significantly.
• K v K [2022] EWCA Civ 468
  Judgments (25/04/2022)
  The Court of Appeal (Vos MR, McFarlane P, King LJ) allowed an appeal against the outcome of a fact-finding hearing in private law proceedings and gave general guidance about the approach to such hearings in light of Re H-N [2021] EWCA Civ 448.
• C v S [2022] EWHC 800 (Fam)
  Judgments (25/04/2022)
  Application to appeal of a refusal of an application for costs
• NHS Trust v ST (refusal of Deprivation of Liberty Order) [2022] EWHC 719 (Fam)
  Judgments (11/04/2022)
  A “shocking” case in which MacDonald J refused to authorise a deprivation of liberty of a child, describing her current situation as “brutal and abusive” and considering that she had been comprehensively failed by Manchester City Council and the NHS Trust.
• P v Q (Financial Remedies) [2022] EWFC B9
  Judgments (07/04/2022)
  Decision of HHJ Hess in which he clarifies the principles to be applied in cases concerning loans to/from family members.
• Goddard-Watts v Goddard-Watts [2022] EWHC 711 (Fam)
  Judgments (04/04/2022)
  Sir Jonathan Cohen made an order for a further lump sum to the applicant at a second rehearing following non-disclosure by the respondent
• Re B (Adequacy of Reasons) [2022] EWCA Civ 407
  Judgments (04/04/2022)
  The Court of Appeal (McFarlane P, LJJs Peter Jackson and Nicola Davies) allowed an appeal against care and placement for adoption orders where the judge had failed to engage properly with the oral evidence and had conducted a linear analysis, discounting the parents before going on to consider the application for a placement order.
• WC v HC [2022] EWFC 22
  Judgments (01/04/2022)
  H and W have two children. The family had lived a 'very affluent' life between the UK and Switzerland, supported almost entirely by H's family money. Mr Justice Peel considered the weight to be attached to a pre-marital agreement, a post-marital agreement, family wealth and prospective inheritance in determining the appropriate financial award division of assets.
• Mohammed bin Rashid al-Maktoum v Princess Haya [2022] EWFC 16
  Judgments (01/04/2022)
  On 9th March the President of the Family Division handed down judgment in this case. The question for the court was whether the final welfare judgment of December 2021 should be published. This concerned the conclusion of long running wardships proceedings involving the parties two children aged 14 and 10.
• Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust v Mrs T & Ors (Rev1) [2022] EWHC 515 (Fam)
  Judgments (28/03/2022)
  This decision of Mrs Justice Morgan concerns an application for authorisation of medical treatment by two health trusts, cooperating over the care of a 17 year old child, described in the judgment as Amy (presumably a pseudonym).
• RL v Nottinghamshire CC & Anor (Rev1) [2022] EWFC 13
  Judgments (21/03/2022)
  This application came before Mostyn J. The mother (RL) sought a rehearing of a fact-finding that took place 5 ½ years ago on 13-17 June 2016 in relation to her then 6 month old daughter, C [1-2]. The Recorder had found on the balance of probabilities that a bruise to C’s right cheek, left cheek, and a fracture to her 7th posterior left rib were inflicted by either her mother or stepfather (DS) [2].
• Baker v Baker [2022] EWFC 15
  Judgments (21/03/2022)
  Mostyn J considers the approach to be taken by a court when considering an application for maintenance pending suit and in particular the issue where the paying party has not provided satisfactory disclosure or explanation of their financial position.
• B, R & G (a Child) [2022] EWHC 320 (Fam)
  Judgments (13/03/2022)
  Judd J refused an application for a reporting restrictions order which would prevent the reporting the names of parents and a deceased sibling in a criminal trial for the murder of the sibling on the basis of the impact on G who was subject to care proceedings. The injunction was granted to prevent the reporting of G’s existence as a member of the family.
• MG v GM [2022] EWFC 8
  Judgments (13/03/2022)
  A judgment determining an application for Maintenance Pending Suit and a Legal Services Payment Order, tried on the basis of submissions in the absence of full financial disclosure.
• IK (A Child), Re (Hague Convention: Evidence Consent) [2022] EWHC 396 (Fam)
  Judgments (09/03/2022)
  A Judgment from Mr Justice Peel on Hague Convention return orders, the defences of consent and acquiescence and the law on habitual residence.
• L (Fact-Finding Hearing: Fairness) [2022] EWCA Civ 169
  Judgments (07/03/2022)
  The Court of Appeal (Lord Justice Baker and Lord Justice Snowden) refuse an appeal against a fact-finding judgment in which a Recorder made findings that went beyond those sought by the local authority.
• R (A Child : Asylum And 1980 Hague Convention Application) (Rev1) [2022] EWCA Civ 188
  Judgments (02/03/2022)
  While a successful asylum application may impact on the implementation of a return order, it does not act as a bar to such an order being made or dispense with the need to determine the application. The timing of an asylum claim may potentially be of considerable importance to the application of the principles set out in G v G
• B (A Child) [2022] EWFC 7
  Judgments (28/02/2022)
  
• Collardeau-Fuchs V Fuchs [2022] EWFC 6
  Judgments (28/02/2022)
  A wife’s application for maintenance pending suit in high net-worth financial proceedings
• Aylward-Davies v Chesterman & Anor [2022] EWFC 4
  Judgments (21/02/2022)
  Application for a Declaration of Parentage under s.55A of the Family Law Act 1986 in respect of a deceased biological father
• S (A Child) (1980 Hague Convention Stranding) [2022] EWHC 214 (Fam)
  Judgments (14/02/2022)
  Peel J considers and applies PD 3AA and 12J (domestic abuse/ coercive control) to a Hague Convention Abduction case and makes a suspended return order to allow M to obtain a visa to travel to Portugal where the welfare issues would be resolved and gave directions to allow a welfare decision if the mother had to return to Pakistan instead.
• A, B and C (Children: Nesting Arrangement) [2022] EWCA Civ 68
  Judgments (14/02/2022)
  The Court of Appeal dismisses a father’s appeal within private law children proceedings against an interim order made by Cohen J, which had varied a ‘nesting’ arrangement.
• Re X, Y and Z (Children-Parental orders- time-limit) [2022] EWHC 198 (Fam)
  Judgments (14/02/2022)
  Mrs Justice Knowles exercised her discretion to make parental orders under s54 of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 in respect of three children despite the applications being made well outside the statutory 6 month time-limit.
• Bailey v Bailey (Committal) (Rev1) [2022] EWFC 5
  Judgments (14/02/2022)
  The court was concerned with applications for committal arising out of alleged breaches of several orders, including an order in financial remedy proceedings.
• Re B-B (Domestic Abuse Fact-Finding)(Rev 1) [2022] EWHC 108 (Fam)
  Judgments (01/02/2022)
  Mr Justice Cobb’s fact-finding judgment in respect of cross-allegations of domestic abuse in a case remitted by the Court of Appeal to the High Court for re-hearing following the mother’s successful appeal in the case of B-B, one of the conjoined appeals reported as Re H-N [2021] EWCA Civ 448.
• Griffiths v Griffiths (Guidance on Contact Costs) [2022] EWHC 113 (Fam)
  Judgments (31/01/2022)
  Arbuthnot J allowed an appeal against an order for direct contact made by the circuit judge at the DRA on the basis that the judge had not given sufficient reasons when dealing with the requirements of PD12J. She also considered the courts power to direct who should pay the costs of contact supervision and how the court should allocate responsibility when there had been findings of domestic abuse against the person seeking contact.
• T v T [2021] EWFC B67
  Judgments (31/01/2022)
  
• Sheffield City Council v M & Ors [2022] EWHC 128 (Fam)
  Judgments (31/01/2022)
  Poole J sets out his reasons for sanctioning the appointment of a Special Advocate for the Respondent father to a Forced Marriage Protection Order application, in which the Applicant sought to withhold certain information from the Respondents.
• S (Vulnerable Party: Fairness of Proceedings) [2022] EWCA Civ 8
  Judgments (31/01/2022)
  
• Re A (a child) [2021] EWHC 3467
  Judgments (24/01/2022)
  Final/ fact finding hearing in Mother’s application for child arrangements, specific issue and prohibited steps orders after Father abducted the child A to Switzerland.
• Borg v El Zubaidy [2021] EWHC 3227 (Fam)
  Judgments (13/12/2021)
  The application before Poole J was the mother’s application for committal of the defendant father for contempt of court, following breaches of court orders designed to allow the mother to travel to Libya to secure the return of the parties’ children, without the father being present.
• M (A Child) [2021] EWHC 3225 (Fam)
  Judgments (13/12/2021)
  Mrs Justice Judd, in granting an appeal against a fact-finding judgment in private law proceedings, stressed the importance of the court complying with Rule 3A and PD 3AA.
• F v M [2021] EWHC 3133 (Fam)
  Judgments (06/12/2021)
  Hayden J refused father’s application in private law proceedings for a prospective determination that any statement or admission he made in respect of the court’s findings would not be disclosed to the police.
• YP (Adoption of 18 year old) [2021] EWHC 3168 (Fam)
  Judgments (06/12/2021)
  A case in which the court examines the criteria set out in the ACA 2002 in the context of an application for an adoption by an applicant regarding a child who turned 18 the day after the application was made, was in an unconventional relationship with the birth mother and who had, ostensibly, not been living with the subject child in the six month period prior to the application being made.
• Re A (A CHILD) (supervised contact) (s91(14) Children Act 1989 orders) [2021] EWCA Civ 1749
  Judgments (06/12/2021)
  The Court dismissed an appeal against an order under s91(14) lasting for 2 years coupled with a supervised contact order whereby there was no provision as to how contact would progress; the Appellant unsuccessfully arguing that this was wrong in principle.
• MG v AR [2021] EWHC 3063 (Fam)
  Judgments (29/11/2021)
  Mosty J granted an application for security for costs. The father had applied for an order in England seeking that a child living in Canada should live with him in Dubai. Mostyn J gives a detailed explanation as to the principles to be applied when considering such an application, noting the rarity of these applications in family proceedings given the rarity of costs orders in both children’s cases and at the conclusion of financial remedy applications.
• Re P (Presumption of Death) [2021] EWHC 3099 (Fam)
  Judgments (29/11/2021)
  In this very sad case, Poole J made a declaration under the Presumption of Death Act 2013 in respect of a man, P, who, together with his travelling companion, disappeared during a trip to South America in 2011. (Judgment given 12th November 2021)
• Cumbria, Northumberland Tyne & Wear NHS Foundation Trust & Anor v EG [2021] EWHC 2990 (Fam)
  Judgments (23/11/2021)
  Lieven J gives reasons for allowing an appeal against the FTT decision to conditionally discharge EG applying s3 Human Rights Act 1998 to extend s72(1)(b)(i) Mental Health Act 1983 to include a requirement to treat in the community. She also dismissed an application to use the inherent jurisdiction of the High Court in respect of vulnerable persons (with capacity), to authorise a deprivation of EG’s liberty, as an unacceptable use of that jurisdiction.
• Re C (Looked After Child) (Covid-19 Vaccination) [2021] EWHC 2993 (Fam)
  Judgments (22/11/2021)
  High Court decision in respect of the approach to COVID-19 and winter flu vaccinations for looked after children.
• Derby CC v CK and Ors (Compliance with DOL Practice Guidance) [2021] EWHC 2931 (Fam)
  Judgments (15/11/2021)
  Decision by MacDonald J on the use of inherent jurisdiction to authorise the deprivation of a child’s liberty in an unregistered placement.
• Rowland v. Blades [2021] EWHC 2928 (Ch)
  Judgments (15/11/2021)
  
• JM v KK [2021] EWFC 54
  Judgments (10/11/2021)
  Decision of Cohen J in which assets had been significantly depleted as a result of previous litigation concerning the parties’ daughter. The case is a reminder that small money cases can be “infinitely more difficult than cases involving larger sums” and that it is often impossible to find a solution that would make both parties happy.
• Disclosure and Barring Service v AB [2021] EWCA Civ 1575
  Judgments (10/11/2021)
  An appeal concerning the powers of the Upper Tribunal hearing an appeal against a decision by the Disclosure and Barring Service, regarding the continued inclusion of the respondent’s name in the children's barred list.
• Re W [2021] EWHC 2844 (Fam)
  Judgments (09/11/2021)
  Care proceedings and children with disabilities – finding a way through the challenges
• Crowther v Crowther & Ors (Financial Remedies) (Rev1) [2021] EWFC 88
  Judgments (08/11/2021)
  
• AB v XS [2021] EWCOP 57
  Judgments (04/11/2021)
  Lieven J determines that the Court of Protection does not have jurisdiction under Mental Capacity Act 2005 to direct the return of XS to this jurisdiction as XS is habitually resident in Lebanon.
• ES v LS [2021] EWHC 2758 (Fam)
  Judgments (01/11/2021)
  A Hague Convention outward return case in which Mostyn J gives a series of strongly worded reminders on how such proceedings should be conducted. He also considers the meaning of the phrase “now settled” in Article 12.
• Lincolnshire County Council v CB & Ors [2021] EWHC 2813 (Fam)
  Judgments (01/11/2021)
  Judgment by Mrs Justice Lieven DBE in which she conducts an analysis of the factors that fall for consideration when making a case management decision regarding the need or otherwise of a separate fact-finding hearing and taking into account the current climate.
• A Local Authority v Mother & Ors [2021] EWHC 2794 (Fam)
  Judgments (01/11/2021)
  An application for a costs order was brought by the LA, the parents, and the Children’s Guardian against DM and MH. DM was originally appointed as the Father’s intermediary and MH acted as his intermediary for 2 days of what was supposed to be the final hearing. The substantive case concerned care proceedings brought by the LA. Mrs Justice Lieven determined that a costs order against DM was justified.
• TMB v PLB [2021] EWFC 66
  Judgments (18/10/2021)
  Sir Jonathan Cohen dismissed a claim for maintenance under the Maintenance Regulation (EC) 4/2009 on the basis that Articles 4, 5 and 7 did not save an application barred by Art 3(c).
• H-W (Children: Proportionality) [2021] EWCA Civ 1451
  Judgments (18/10/2021)
  The current care proceedings related to the youngest 4 children (C, D, E and F). Concerns re-emerged in November 2019 (very shortly after the case had been closed to social services).
• A Borough Council v E and Others (No 2) (Refusal of Secure Accommodation Order) [2021] EWHC 2699 (Fam)
  Judgments (18/10/2021)
  The local authority applied for a further secure accommodation order in respect of E, a girl aged 16 at a hearing on 11th October 2021.
• Nottinghamshire County Council v LH (A child (No. 2) [2021] EWHC 2593 (Fam)
  Judgments (12/10/2021)
  On 23 September 2021 Poole J refused an application under the Inherent Jurisdiction of the High Court to authorise the accommodation of a child (LH) in a psychiatric unit, when her condition did not justify the detention there and indeed the placement was not merely inappropriate but harmful:
• Nottinghamshire County Council v LH (A child (No. 1) [2021] EWHC 2584 (Fam)
  Judgments (11/10/2021)
  A judgment in which the Court refuses to make a deprivation of liberty order, where the local authority is unable to identify a suitable therapeutic placement for the child, and continued detention at the psychiatric unit was found harmful to a child who did not suffer from a psychiatric condition.
• R (On the application of Cornerstone (North East) Adoption and Fostering Services Ltd v Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills (Ofsted) [2021] EWCA Civ 1390
  Judgments (05/10/2021)
  
• Birmingham City Council v R & Ors [2021] EWHC 2556 (Fam)
  Judgments (04/10/2021)
  Application for the court to review a Deprivation of Liberty Order authorisation
• B-M (Children: Findings of Fact) [2021] EWCA Civ 1371
  Judgments (27/09/2021)
  Appeals made by the mother (‘M’) and Appellant father (‘F2’) from the findings of fact made in a reserved judgment of HHJ Sapnara on 19 March 2019. The appeals were dismissed.
• M A-G v HARTLEY (CONTEMPT) [2021] EWHC 2473 (FAM)
  Judgments (27/09/2021)
  A comprehensive judgment on contempt of court, following publication by a father of information about family proceedings on Facebook.
• Warrington BC v T, R, W and K [2021] EWFC 68
  Judgments (20/09/2021)
  The case concerned K, aged 7, a child of Gabonese nationality. K was the subject of care proceedings instigated following allegations made by the mother concerning sexual abuse of K by his step father, and consequential discovery of very poor home conditions.
• Tameside MBC v AM and others [2021] EWHC 2472 (Fam)
  Judgments (13/09/2021)
  Judgment of MacDonald J confirming that, following amended regulations prohibiting the placement of looked after children under 16 in unregulated placements, it remains open to the High Court to authorise, under its inherent jurisdiction, the deprivation of liberty of children in such placements, provided that procedural safeguards are complied with.
• Hussain V Parveen [2021] EWFC 73
  Judgments (13/09/2021)
  This case concerned a question of whether a talaq obtained in Pakistan was "an overseas divorce" capable of recognition under ss. 45 and 46 of the Recognition of Divorces, Annulments and Legal Separations Act 1986 (‘the 1986 Act’).
• X (Children)(Article 61 Biia) [2021] EWCA Civ 1305
  Judgments (06/09/2021)
  This case concerned the interrelationship between Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 (“BIIa”) and the Hague Convention of 19 October 1996 on Jurisdiction, Applicable law, Recognition, Enforcement and Cooperation in Respect of Parental Responsibility and Measures for the Protection of Children (“the 1996 Hague Convention”).
• J v J (Return to Non-Hague Convention Country) [2021] EWHC 2412 (Fam)
  Judgments (06/09/2021)
  An application was brought by the father, who sought the summary return of his 5-year-old son D to India. The mother opposed the application.
• Botwe v Brifa [2021] EWHC 2307 (Fam)
  Judgments (03/09/2021)
  A case determined in the High Court by Mr Justice Cobb highlighting the need for careful compliance with the provisions of the Family Law Act 1986 when it comes to overseas divorces to ensure that they are recognised in this jurisdiction and do not lead to ‘limping marriages’. The case was brought by an applicant wife, Ms Botwe, pursuant to the provisions of sections 51 and 55 Family Law Act 1986. The wife sought a declaration that she remained married to Mr Johnson Brifa (‘the husband’). The husband argued that the parties had legally divorced in Ghana and that that marriage should be recognised in this jurisdiction.
• P v P (Divorce: Jurisdiction) [2021] EWHC 2306 (Fam)
  Judgments (03/09/2021)
  Cobb J considers the test to be applied when deciding whether the English Family Court should exercise or decline jurisdiction in divorce proceedings where proceedings had been issued in another jurisdiction during the Brexit transition period.
• Re W (Young Person: Unavailability of Suitable Placement) [2021] EWHC 2345 (Fam)
  Judgments (03/09/2021)
  In this case Knowles J was taking a decision about W. W is 15 and lives with her mother and brother.
• JC v PC [2021] EWHC 2305 (Fam)
  Judgments (02/09/2021)
  In the context of an application for children’s summary return to this jurisdiction Mrs Justice Roberts considers the preliminary issue of whether children remain habitually resident here or have acquired habitual residence in Brazil. (Judgment given 9th August 2021)
• B (Children), Re [2021] EWCA Civ 1221
  Judgments (22/08/2021)
  This case involved the mother of two children, B aged nearly 3 years and C nearly 5 months old.
• I-A (Children) (Revocation of Adoption Order) [2021] EWCA Civ 1222
  Judgments (22/08/2021)
  Court of Appeal dismisses a mother’s appeal against an order dismissing her application to revoke adoption orders. The procedural irregularity in the making of the adoption orders did not amount to a fundamental breach of natural justice so as to give the High Court a discretion under the inherent jurisdiction to revoke the order.
• T & Anor v L & Ors (Inherent Jurisdiction : Costs) [2021] EWHC 2147 (Fam)
  Judgments (22/08/2021)
  Cobb J considers the principles to be applied when determining the issues of costs in cases involving the inherent jurisdiction of the High Court when considering the welfare of an adult whose capacity was in issue.
• Re C (A Child) (Child Abduction: Parent’s Refusal to Return with Child) [2021] EWCA Civ 1216
  Judgments (22/08/2021)
  The Court of Appeal refused the mother’s appeal against a return order, concluding that Cohen J applied the correct test and was entitled to find, as he did, that the mother would return with the child if the order was made.
• F-S (A Child: Placement Order) [2021] EWCA Civ 1212
  Judgments (15/08/2021)
  Court of Appeal dismisses a mother’s appeal from the making of a placement order.
• P (A Child) (Abduction: Inherent Jurisdiction) EWCA Civ 1171
  Judgments (15/08/2021)
  The case concerned P, a boy aged 4. His parents are Indian citizens. Although both sets of grandparents live in Gujarat, neither parent currently lives in India. F’s father (“F”) became a US citizen following a previous marriage and is an Overseas Indian Citizen, so can enter India without a visa. P’s mother (“M”) lives in the United States, although entered the country in 2015 without a visa and has an outstanding asylum application. The parties met in 2015 and P was born in 2016. He is a US citizen.
• Re YW (A CHILD) (ADEQUACY OF REASONS) [2021] EWCA Civ 1174
  Judgments (08/08/2021)
  The Court of Appeal considers the adequacy of reasons given by the judge at first instance and concludes that the judgment did not sufficiently explain the judge's reasoning for making the findings and did not properly have regard to each piece of evidence in the context of the totality of the evidence before reaching her conclusions.
• North Yorkshire County Council v M & Others (Medium Secure Bed) [2021] EWHC 2171 (Fam)
  Judgments (08/08/2021)
  Mr Justice MacDonald considers an impasse that has left a deeply troubled adolescent without the medium secure NHS bed she requires and deprived of her liberty in a secure unit in which her needs are not being met and her condition is bound to deteriorate.
• Re D (Care Proceedings:1996 Hague Convention: Article 9 Request) [2021] EWHC 1970 ( Fam)
  Judgments (08/08/2021)
  The Local Authority had issued care proceedings in November 2020 in relation to a boy (D) who was a British National (on the assumption that he was the mother’s natural child) and who lived with foster-carers in Switzerland following a welfare decision made by the Swiss authorities.
• Re G (Young Person: Threat to Life: Unavailability of Secure Placement) [2021] EWHC 2066 (Fam)
  Judgments (01/08/2021)
  A judgment surrounding the plight of G, an extremely vulnerable child whose life is at risk but who – like many other young people who require specialist secure placements – cannot be so placed given the scarcity of such resources [8].
• H v An Adoption Agency (No.2)(Declaration of Parentage and Public Policy) [2021] EWHC 1943 (Fam)
  Judgments (01/08/2021)
  • Second judgement in the matter concerning the issues of declaration of parentage for an adopted child • Can a birth parent not previously registered on the Childs birth certificate apply for a declaration of parentage after that child has been adopted pursuant to s55A(91) Family Law Act • Does the court have power to disapply provisions of FPR 2010 r 8.22(1) to avoid the Childs adopted name appearing on the declaration of parentage • Would the Registrar General accept a declaration of parentage if the court had disapplied FPR r8.22(1) • If the Registrar General agrees to re-register the birth would he be able and willing to add the words adopted where the child who is the subject of the declaration has been made the subject of an adoption order by the court. • Is it contrary to public policy to allow such an application in these circumstances
• H v R (Habitual Residence in Pakistan) [2021] EWHC 2024 (Fam)
  Judgments (01/08/2021)
  Mr Justice MacDonald considers an application under the inherent jurisdiction for summary return of a 13-year-old child from Pakistan.
• T(A child) [2021] UKSC 35
  Judgments (30/07/2021)
  Supreme Court judgment dismissing the appeal of T, a 15-year old, and holding that the use of the inherent jurisdiction to authorise the deprivation of liberty in cases such as this is permissible, but expressing grave concern about its use to fill a gap in the child care system caused by inadequate resources.
• AA v BB [2021] EWHC 1822 (Fam)
  Judgments (26/07/2021)
  Judd J allows an appeal in a private law children’s case, dealing with the number of allegations to be investigated and the scope of the evidence to be relied on for a fact-finding, following Re H-N, Re T, Re H and Re B-B [2021] EWCA Civ 448
• HW v WW [2021] EWFC B20
  Judgments (25/07/2021)
  The Covid 19 pandemic is capable of being a Barder event, but the impact of the pandemic on the parties’ company was reasonably foreseeable at the date of the consent order and the husband’s set-aside application was dismissed.
• AE & JE v M [2021] EWHC 1957 (Fam)
  Judgments (25/07/2021)
  An application under the inherent jurisdiction by two teenage siblings seeking wardship orders including declarations as to their status and a variation of a child arrangements order.
• Re R (A Child) [2021] EWCA Civ 1019
  Judgments (18/07/2021)
  Successful appeal against the rejection of the Local Authority’s care plan for adoption. Proceedings were remitted for re-hearing due to the Recorder’s failure to undertake the Re G balancing exercise
• A v A (Arbitration: Guidance) [2021] EWHC 1889 (Fam)
  Judgments (18/07/2021)
  Mostyn J dismissed a challenge to a financial provision arbitration award. He issued important guidance in an Appendix on the challenging and enforcement of such awards, with the approval of the President of the Family Division.
• K v H [2021] EWHC 1918 (Fam)
  Judgments (18/07/2021)
  On an application by the Mother under the inherent jurisdiction of the High Court to consider whether the court had jurisdiction to exercise its residual parens patriae in respect of the children in circumstances where B and E were habitually resident in Sudan, the court considered it did not and the application was dismissed.
• Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council v C & Ors [2021] EWHC 1814 (Fam)
  Judgments (18/07/2021)
  Application by the local authority to deprive a 17 year old boy (L) of his liberty under the inherent jurisdiction and thereby to extend his time at his residential unit. One of the main issues was whether it was right to deprive a child of his liberty just because there was no alternative options available to safeguard the child. NB: Certain of the issues in this case are currently the subject of consideration by the Supreme Court, from which court judgment is awaited in the appeal from the decision of the Court of Appeal in Re T (A Child) [2018] EWCA Civ 2136.
• K & Ors v K [2021] EWHC 1846 (Fam)
  Judgments (18/07/2021)
  An appeal heard by Mr Justice Cobb brought under Chapter III (Recognition and Enforcement) of Council Regulation (EC) No.2201/2003 ('BIIR') concerning whether a Polish custody order from December 2016 should be recognised and enforced. Post-Brexit, BIIR continues to apply under the transitional arrangements for cases issued on or before 31 December 2020.
• Hasan v Ul-Hasan (Deceased) Anor [2021] EWHC 1791 (Fam)
  Judgments (11/07/2021)
  The key issue in this was whether the unadjudicated claim by the wife under Part III survived the death of the husband and could be continued against his estate.
• Child And Family Agency of Ireland v AB [2021] EWHC 1774 (Fam)
  Judgments (11/07/2021)
  Keehan J decides the first application made by the The Child and Family Agency in Ireland (CFA) for a transfer request pursuant to Article 8 of the 1996 Convention rather than the previously used provision of Article 15 of the Brussels II Revised regulation ('BIIR').
• AA v BB [2021] EWFC 55
  Judgments (11/07/2021)
  On an application for temporary leave to remove two young children to non-Convention countries the court determined that the risks of allowing the father to remove the children for contact could not be mitigated by any protective measures.
• Abbasi & Anor v Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2021] EWHC 1699( Admin)
  Judgments (04/07/2021)
  Before the President of the Family Division, this case concerned 2 separate applications relating to 2 different children.
• A v B (Port Alert) [2021] EWHC 1716 (Fam)
  Judgments (04/07/2021)
  Mostyn J gives guidance on applications for free standing port alert orders in the Family Court.
• Re A (Children) (Abduction Article 13(b) [2021] EWCA Civ 939
  Judgments (01/07/2021)
  The Court of Appeal granted the mother’s appeal against an order of Mrs Justice Judd which required the mother to return the children to the USA, having concluded that the judge had not applied the guidance set out in Re E (Children) (Abduction: Custody Appeal) [2011] UKSC 27, [2012] 1 AC 144.
• Greater Manchester Police v Zuniga & Ors [2021] EWHC 1572
  Judgments (27/06/2021)
  McFarlane P gives permission for GMP to hold a class of data in connection with cases determined in the Family jurisdiction.
• R (Care Proceedings Joinder of Foster Carers) 2021 EWCA Civ 875
  Judgments (27/06/2021)
  The issue with which the appeal was concerned was the decision to join a child’s foster parents, who had a wish to adopt the child, to the care proceedings.
• P (Circumcision Child in Care) [2021] EWHC 1616
  Judgments (20/06/2021)
  Application to circumcise a boy subject to an interim care order
• Q, R and S (children) (RRO Application) [2021] EWHC 1492
  Judgments (20/06/2021)
  Hertfordshire Local Authority (the LA) applied for a reporting restriction order (RRO) in proceedings concerning three children whose mother was murdered by their father.
• M (Children: Applications by Email) [2021] EWCA Civ 806
  Judgments (13/06/2021)
  Court of Appeal allows an appeal stating that the fact that an application is made by email or decided without a hearing does not mean that it should receive less careful scrutiny and there are limits to the use of flexible and informal decision making and the default position is that there should be a hearing, even if conducted remotely.
• X [2021] EWFC 46
  Judgments (13/06/2021)
  First instance judgment of Peel J following a final hearing in care proceedings in which a central issue was the level of risk to the subject child presented by findings of Fabricated or Induced Illness (FII) made within previous proceedings relating to other children 7 years earlier.
• M v D [2021] EWHC 1351
  Judgments (07/06/2021)
  This case concerns the meaning of the term "associated person" in s. 62(3) of the Family Law Act 1996.
• Re K [2021] EWHC 1409 (Fam)
  Judgments (06/06/2021)
  A rehearing by the President, the Right Honourable Sir Andrew McFarlane, in May 2021, , following a successful appeal in November 2020 of Keehan J’s welfare decisions in September 2020 for placement orders. At the rehearing, there was a concessions that Keehan J’s decision to make placement orders was correct. There was an additional psychological assessment of the parents and an expert recommendation for therapy and rehabilitation, but ultimately the President made the placement orders sought by the local authority and guardian, based on there being no realistic prospect of therapy producing sufficient enduring change.
• Manchester University NHS Trust v Fixsler and Others [2021] EWHC 1426
  Judgments (06/06/2021)
  MacDonald J granted the Trust’s application for a declaration that it was not in the interests of two-year old Alta for life-sustaining treatment to be continued and refused her parents’ application to move her to a hospital in Israel.
• Re L (A Child: Step-Parent Adoption) [2021] EWCA Civ 801
  Judgments (06/06/2021)
  A father’s unsuccessful attempt to appeal against an adoption order in favour of the child’s step-father.
• C v B [2021] EWHC 1369
  Judgments (06/06/2021)
  The case concerned an application by a father for return of two children to Spain under the 1980 Hague Convention.
• H-M (Children) [2021] EWCA Civ 748
  Judgments (02/06/2021)
  The Court of Appeal dismissed the mother’s second appeal relating to a fact-finding hearing. The criminal proceedings and the family proceedings had reached incongruent outcomes, in that the mother was in the family court’s pool of perpetrators but was exonerated of causing injury in the criminal court. Jackson LJ’s judgment upheld the lower court’s decision to refuse her application to reopen, and also helpfully sets out some differences between a reopening and an appeal of a fact find, as well as the proper approach when criminal and family court outcomes are incongruent.
• TT (Children: Discharge of Care Order) [2021] EWCA Civ 742
  Judgments (02/06/2021)
  The Court of Appeal sets out the tests to be applied on an application to discharge a care order and also considered the relevance of attachment theory in welfare evaluations. Mostyn J approach to these issues in GM v Carmarthenshire County Council [2018] EWFC 36, [2018] 3 WLR 1126 ('GM”) was overruled.
• D (A Child) [2021] EWCA Civ 787
  Judgments (02/06/2021)
  This is a judgment of Lord Justice Jackson written in plain English. It concerns a successful appeal of the lower court’s decision to sanction removal of O, a newborn baby, from his mother, V, who has learning difficulties.
• Re N (Children) [2021] EWCA Civ 785
  Judgments (02/06/2021)
  Appeal against the making of a placement order. Breach of the Adoption Agency Regulations 2005. Placement order set aside.
• London Borough of Barnet v AG & Others [2021] EWHC 1253
  Judgments (23/05/2021)
  The case concerned children living in the London Borough of Barnet (LBB) about whom the LBB had serious concerns. In January 2020 the 6 children were aged 5, 9, 14, 17 and (twins) 18. Safeguarding referrals were received in November 2019 and January 2020. The children’s parents were a diplomat and his wife, and in November 2019 refused consent for the children to be spoken to at home or at school, relying on diplomatic immunity. After the January 2020 referral the police informed the LBB that diplomatic immunity prevented a police investigation. LBB spoke to the children at school, and the children made allegations of significant physical mistreatment, on occasions requiring medical treatment. The parents claimed that diplomatic immunity prevented the LBB from placing any information about them before the court.
• Manchester City Council v D (Application for Permission Withdraw Proceedings after Abduction) [2021] EWHC 1191
  Judgments (23/05/2021)
  The local authority was granted leave to withdraw care proceedings where the children had been unlawfully abducted to Pakistan and were not likely to be returned. The court however had made the children wards of court and ordered that they be returned to the jurisdiction. The wardship was continued and the judgment passed to the police and Interpol.
• D v E (termination of parental responsibility) [2021] EWFC 37
  Judgments (19/05/2021)
  Application by the mother to terminate the father’s parental responsibility pursuant to s 4 (2A) of the Children Act 1989 granted. Permission also given to change the child’s surname
• Re O (A Child: The Vienna Convention on Consular Relations 1963 [2021] EWHC 908
  Judgments (16/05/2021)
  The court was concerned with O who was born in 2007 and thus 13 years old at the time of judgment. She is a citizen of the Democratic Republic of the Congo ('DRC') and arrived in the UK around 2nd August 2020. It appears that O’s father died in prison in 2018 and in July 2020 O, her brothers and mother were arrested. O evaded detention and was cared for by a friend of her mother’s K, who eventually brought her to the UK and left her at a bus stop.
• AX v BX & Ors (Revocation of Adoption Order) (Rev 1) [2021] EWHC 1121
  Judgments (16/05/2021)
  This case concerns the legal framework and circumstances in which an application under the inherent jurisdiction for the revocation of a lawfully made adoption order will be granted.
• Barclay v Barclay [2021] EWFC 40
  Judgments (11/05/2021)
  Permission for publication of substantive judgment in financial remedy proceedings refused, reporting restrictions order to remain in place
• Re S (A Child) [2021] EWCA Civ 605
  Judgments (09/05/2021)
  The Court of Appeal ordered a rehearing of a mother’s application for leave to oppose an adoption application, because of procedural unfairness. The local authority’s failure to ensure that the necessary material was available to the mother and the court was criticised.
• Re F & G (Discharge of Special Guardianship Order) [2021] EWCA Civ 622
  Judgments (09/05/2021)
  The Court of Appeal confirmed that a special guardianship order can co-exist with a care order and remitted for re-hearing the question of whether or not the SGO in this case should be discharged.
• CHF & ORS, R (On the Application Of) v Newick Church of England Primary School & Anor [2021] EWCA Civ 613
  Judgments (09/05/2021)
  This was an appeal in respect of an order protecting the identification of the Appellants’ children in any reporting of judicial review proceedings. The Respondents were their children’s primary school and the Council responsible for it.
• A County Council v M & H & T [2021] EWFC 35
  Judgments (07/05/2021)
  A local authority’s application not to assess a grandmother as a carer was granted and the grandmother’s application for a Special Guardianship Order or a Child Arrangements Order was dismissed.
• Akhmedova v Akhmedov & Ors. [2021] EWHC 545
  Judgments (04/05/2021)
  On 21 April 2021, Mrs Justice Knowles handed down the 16th reported judgment in proceedings brought by a wife, Tatiana Akhmedova (‘W’), in her attempts to enforce an award made at the conclusion of financial remedy proceedings in December 2016 against her ex-husband, Farkhad Akhmedov (‘H’).
• Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037
  Judgments (29/04/2021)
  The case concerned an application by an NHS Trust which would permit them to not provide blood transfusions or treatment involving blood products to a 17 years and 4 month old patient, DL.
• YY (Children: Conduct of the Local Authority) [2021] EWHC 749 (Fam)
  Judgments (25/04/2021)
  Keehan J’s judgement (89 pages) was delivered at the conclusion of a fact-finding hearing on 3 applications: contact to children in care, discharge of care with the making of a special guardianship order to long-term foster carers and permission to change the children’s surname. It describes what found to be “egregious and long-standing failures” by the local authority and he questioned whether its children’s services were fit for purpose. [226-227] The 3 children were 17, 13 and 11. A fourth child C had died at the age of 14 in 2019.
• Re C (A Child) [2021] EWFC 32
  Judgments (25/04/2021)
  A judgment determining, as a preliminary issue, whether the English court had jurisdiction to hear M’s maintenance application brought pursuant to Schedule 1 of the Children Act 1989 following earlier proceedings issued by F in Monaco.
• P (a Child) (Interim Separation) [2021] EWCA Civ 499
  Judgments (25/04/2021)
  A successful appeal resulting in the interim placement of a baby in foster care pending the full hearing.
• NHS Trust v S [2021] EWHC 594 (Fam)
  Judgments (18/04/2021)
  Application by hospital trust for declaration that it is lawful and in the best interests of a nine month old baby to withdraw life-sustaining treatment including ventilation
• Re F (assessment of birth family) [2021] EWFC 31
  Judgments (18/04/2021)
  Application by a Local Authority under Part 18 FPR 2010 to determine whether the “original family” of the mother of F, who was adopted, should be assessed as kinship carers for F. On the facts of the case the Court determined the LA had no obligation to assess but cautioned against this being read as a decision of wider application
• AB v CD [2021] EWHC 819
  Judgments (11/04/2021)
  In a private law children case with cross-allegations of domestic abuse, Mrs Justice Roberts of the High Court allowed a father’s appeal against Recorder Armitage’s findings of rape and threats to remove their child to Pakistan, following a 4-day fact-finding hearing. Roberts J determined that the manner in which the Recorder reached her conclusions was flawed, and the case was remitted for an early rehearing.
• Re W and Re Z (EU Settled Status for Looked After Children) [2021] EWHC 783
  Judgments (11/04/2021)
  This case examines in general the ambit of section 33 of the Children Act 1989 and in particular how local authorities should approach applications for immigration status for those children in their care. Some children will be subject to care orders which confers parental responsibility upon the local authority. Section 33 permits the local authority to restrict the exercise of parental responsibility by others such as parents, when it is necessary for the child’s welfare.
• AB v CD (Abduction: Undertakings) [2021] EWHC 665
  Judgments (09/04/2021)
  Hague Convention proceedings in which Mr Justice Peel rejected the mother’s defences and ordered the return of children aged 7 and 3 to Kazakhstan notwithstanding the father’s undertakings would not be enforceable in that jurisdiction.
• AB v CD & Ors [2021] EWHC 741
  Judgments (06/04/2021)
  An application by, AB, the mother of a child, XY for a declaration that she and CD, the child’s father, have the legal ability to consent to the administration of hormone treatment to suppress puberty, known as “PBs”/puberty blockers. The case concerned a 15 year-old child, with Gender Dysphoria, who was born a boy, came out as transgender at age 10, and had transitioned socially in all aspects of life, including legal paper work, which included a name change by deed poll.
• Parfitt v Guy's and St Thomas' Children's NHS Foundation Trust & Anor [2021] EWCA Civ 362
  Judgments (28/03/2021)
  This case concerns a child (aged almost 6 years) who suffers with acute necrotising encephalopathy ("ANE") from which she developed serious illness and ultimately slipped into a persistent vegetative state ("PVS").
• Rezai-Namaghi v Atapour [2020] EWHC 3729 (Fam)
  Judgments (25/03/2021)
  This case is an important reminder of the need to ensure that the relevant formalities have been complied with. In this case the critical issue was whether or not decree nisi had been pronounced.
• FRB v DCA (no 3) [2020] EWHC 3696
  Judgments (21/03/2021)
  Insufficient evidence to support an application to vary a final order in financial remedy proceedings on the basis that the economic impact of COVID -19 constituted a Barder event
• SZ v Birmingham City Council & Ors [2021] EWFC 15
  Judgments (21/03/2021)
  This was a decision of Mr Justice Mostyn to summarily dismiss a father’s application for contact with two children in care.
• A (Child Abduction Article 13b) [2021] EWCA Civ 328
  Judgments (19/03/2021)
  Successful appeal from an order for the summary return of a child to the USA in light of new evidence
• Re H (Children: Findings of Fact) [2021] EWCA Civ 319
  Judgments (14/03/2021)
  Appeal against findings that the father sexually abused his daughter and step-daughter. Detailed examination of the trial judge’s reasoning. Appeal dismissed.
• AA and BB [2021] EWFC 17
  Judgments (14/03/2021)
  Decision of Mr Nicholas Cusworth QC sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge on 17 February 2021 considering Article 13 of the 1996 Hague Convention on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law, Recognition, Enforcement and Cooperation in respect of Parental Responsibility and Measures for the Protection of Children (“The 1996 Convention”)
• East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust v GH (Out of Hours Application) [2021]EWCOP 18
  Judgments (12/03/2021)
  Macdonald J gives judgment on an out of hours application in which a health trust sought authority to remove a woman, who was in obstructed labour, from her home to hospital to deliver the baby there, including an emergency Caesarean operation if necessary. He granted the application.
• BB(Children) [2021] EWFC 20
  Judgments (11/03/2021)
  An application which raised the question of the court’s power to dismiss an application and the evidential implications of an application by a Local Authority to seek to withdraw allegations at an interim stage during a fact – finding hearing
• Durrell v Scaife[2021]
  Judgments (11/03/2021)
  Sentence of eight weeks ordered in committal proceedings for calling the Judge “a stupid cunt” and putting the judge in fear of his safety
• Kicinski v Pardi [2021] EWHC 499 (Fam)
  Judgments (11/03/2021)
  Appeal against decision that the Thwaite jurisdiction did not apply to the executory Rose order the parties had agreed in settlement of financial proceedings allowed and order varied.
• Hussain[2021] EWFC 13
  Judgments (11/03/2021)
  Application for permission to appeal out of time a final order in financial remedy proceedings made in 2018 allowed
• A (A Child) (1980 Hague Convention: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
  Judgments (07/03/2021)
  A father successfully appealed a decision to set aside a return order.
• Re O (Judgment: Adequacy of Reasons) [2021] EWCA Civ 149
  Judgments (01/03/2021)
  Appeal against findings that the father sexually abused his daughter. Appeal allowed; case remitted for rehearing.
• Project for the Registration of children as British citizens & Anor [2021]
  Judgments (01/03/2021)
  Appeal and cross appeal concerning the fees charged for children to register as British citizens. Court upheld finding that the Secretary of State had failed in her duty under s.55 of the Borders, Citizenship and Immigration Act 2009 to assess children’s best interests and ensure that these were a primary consideration
• R (Children: Control of Court Documents) [2021] EWCA Civ 162
  Judgments (22/02/2021)
  An appeal in which the court deals with “the Family Court's powers to control the distribution of sensitive material and the principles on which such powers should be exercised.” [11]
• WX v HX (Treatment of Matrimonial and Non-Matrimonial Property) [2021] EWHC 241 (Fam) (10 February 2021)
  Judgments (18/02/2021)
  Application for a financial remedy order in a 33-year marriage, involving the identification of matrimonial and non-matrimonial property.
• G (Abduction Consent discretion) [2021] EWCA Civ 139 (09 February 2021)
  Judgments (18/02/2021)
  The case concerned an appeal against a return order made under the 1980 Hague Convention. The appeal mainly centred on the judge’s exercise of his discretion to make a return order, although the father challenged the findings made on the issue of consent.
• AG v VD[ 2021] EWFC 9
  Judgments (17/02/2021)
  Matrimonial finance proceedings with a jurisdictional issue resolved in favour of the English court despite previous financial proceedings in Russia. H lost on his assertion that he had transferred most of his wealth to his son from a previous marriage. But H’s substantial assets from property development businesses were determined to be pre-marital. The matter therefore concluded with an award based on need, not on sharing as sought by W.
• Lancashire CC v G (No 4)(Continuing Unavailability of Regulated Placement) 2021 EWHC 244 (Fam)
  Judgments (17/02/2021)
  This is a sad case seeking to raise the alarm about the drastic shortage of regulated placements capable of meeting the welfare needs of children with complex emotional and behavioural needs. The case concerned G who, in Mr Justice MacDonald’s words, is “a highly troubled and vulnerable young woman with multifaceted emotional and behavioural difficulties and at high risk of serious self-harm or suicide”.
• Derhalli v Derhalli [2021] EWCA Civ 112
  Judgments (15/02/2021)
  A husband’s unsuccessful second appeal in possession proceedings which depended upon the proper interpretation of a Consent Order in financial remedy proceedings.
• TK v. ML [2021] EWFC 8
  Judgments (15/02/2021)
  Mostyn J emphasises the prime criterion of temporal proximity when seeking to establish a causal link for the purposes of relying on residual jurisdiction The preliminary issue before the court was whether it had jurisdiction to hear M’s C100 application pursuant to s.8 CA 1989.
• IU v OS [2020] EWFC 98
  Judgments (12/02/2021)
  This case concerned an application for a financial remedy brought by IU, a wife (‘W’), against OS, her husband (‘H’).
• A City Council v X, Y and Q (DOLS: Lack of secure placement)[2021] EWHC 123 (Fam)
  Judgments (08/02/2021)
  
• JB (a child) Re (sexual abuse allegations) [2021] EWCA Civ 46
  Judgments (08/02/2021)
  Appeal against findings of sexual abuse on the basis of allegations made by a child for the first time at age nine about incidents that had happened some 4-5 years previously upheld.
• Finch v Baker [2021] EWCA Civ 72
  Judgments (03/02/2021)
  This was a 2nd appeal in a financial provision case. Moylan LJ gave the only substantive judgment. The appeal was dismissed.
• A Local Authority v TA & Others [2021] EWCOP 3
  Judgments (27/01/2021)
  Judgment handed down by Mr Justice Cobb on 22nd January 2021
• Salford CC v W and Ors [2021] EWHC 61 (Fam)
  Judgments (27/01/2021)
  MacDonald J in the High Court, Family Division: (1) dismissed a prohibited steps order application preventing Roman Catholic sacraments for children ages 4-11 in a proposed Special Guardianship setting, and (2) adjourned an application for a declaration on their legal status (for purposes of eventually determining the local authority’s obligation to pay remuneration), pending involvement in the question from both local authorities (Norfolk and Suffolk).
• OX44/2020 [2021] EWHC 91 (Fam)
  Judgments (26/01/2021)
  Applications pursuant to Part 19 FPR 2010 within adoption proceedings to determine whether the local authority is under a duty to notify the Romanian Central Authority of the proceedings and if not, should their assistance be sought to identify the birth father and wider family.
• A Local Authority v JK & Anor [2021] EWHC 33 (Fam)
  Judgments (25/01/2021)
  Application by Local Authority for orders under FPR Part 19 r14.21 and inherent jurisdiction to endorse decision not to disclose a child’s existence to his father and maternal family dismissed. Court critical of delay in applications
• F v M [2021] EWFC 4
  Judgments (22/01/2021)
  Mr Justice Hayden’s detailed judgment, making extensive findings of coercive and controlling behaviour, underlines the need for the court to assess a pattern or series of acts cumulatively.
• Rattan v Kuwad [2021] EWCA Civ 1
  Judgments (18/01/2021)
  A wife’s successful appeal from an order allowing a husband’s appeal against a maintenance pending suit order.
• London Borough of Southwark v A Family [2020] EWHC 3117 (Fam)
  Judgments (08/01/2021)
  
• Crowther v Crowther & Ors [2020] EWHC 3555 (Fam)
  Judgments (07/01/2021)
  Successful application for indemnity costs on preliminary issues in financial remedy proceedings when allegations of fraud and conspiracy were withdrawn and claims discontinued shortly before the trial.
• RE AB (Court of Protection: Police Disclosure) [2019] EWCOP 66
  Judgments (07/01/2021)
  The Court considered an application by a ‘Police Force’ for disclosure of psychological reports prepared in relation to AB who was and is the subject of proceedings in the Court of Protection and who is an immensely vulnerable person.
• Z v University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust & Ors [2020] EWCOP 69
  Judgments (07/01/2021)
  A decision by Mr Justice Cohen in the Court of Protection, which reiterated his previous decision to end life sustaining treatment for RS, an unconscious man in a vegetative state. This application had been brought by RS’s estranged birth family, who argued that RS would wish to be kept alive based on his Catholic faith and who sought to move him to Poland.
• M v H ( private law vaccination) [2020] EWFC 93
  Judgments (06/01/2021)
  MacDonald J granted a specific issue order authorising the administration of vaccinations to two children, ages 6 and 4 in accordance with the NHS vaccination schedule. In doing so he considered the role of the court in this area, the application of the principles set out in Re H (A Child: Parental Responsibility: Vaccination) [2020] EWCA Civ 664 in private law disputes, the use of expert evidence and the approach to proportionality under Article 8.
• London Borough of Lambeth v L (Unlawful Placement) [2020] EWHC 3383 (Fam)
  Judgments (06/01/2021)
  Authorisation of deprivation of liberty of a 13 year old boy in a placement out of jurisdiction – local authority had delayed significantly in issuing application – reminder that a local authority leaves itself open to liability in damages (sometimes considerable) if a child is placed in circumstances amounting to a deprivation of liberty without first seeking such an order