Housing Law WeekAlphabiolabsBerkeley Lifford Hall Accountancy Services

Supreme Court to hand down judgment in Hague Convention appeal on 4th December

Court to consider consequence of return orders erroneously granted

The Supreme Court will hand down judgment in Re KL (A Child) on Wednesday, 4th December. This is the appeal from DL v EL [2013] EWCA Civ 865.

The Court will consider the correct approach to be taken to the situation where a child is removed from his/her country of residence pursuant to a return order under the Hague Convention, which order is made erroneously and overturned on appeal. The court will also determine whether, in those circumstances, the parent from the care of whom the child was removed has a remedy to recover the child.

The father in this case is a male US national of Ghanaian origin, the mother a female Ghanaian national currently based in the UK. The father and the mother married in Texas in December 2005, where their child K was born in August 2006. The father and the mother lived together in Texas until their divorce in 2008. In July 2008 the mother and child went to England where they remained until February 2010. In 2010, the father was granted custody of K and the right to designate his place of residence by the Texas courts. In 2011, however, the mother instituted abduction proceedings in the Texas Federal Court on the basis that K was being wrongly retained in Texas by the father. She obtained an order requiring K and his passport immediately to be delivered to her. The father complied with the order, and K and the mother travelled to England in August 2011. The father then appealed against the order, which was overturned in July 2012. The mother appealed this, but her appeal was rejected: on the 29th August the Texan court made an order requiring the mother to return K to the father. She remains in breach of that order. The father issued an application for the return of K in the UK under the Hague Convention on 9 August 2012 and then a further application in September 2012. The High Court and Court of Appeal have rejected the father's claim.

The Court of Appeal judgment can be read here,