AlphabiolabsHousing Law WeekBerkeley Lifford Hall Accountancy Services

Care cases shorter where family court advisers involved

Pre-proceedings involvement can shorten cases by three weeks

Hearings for children facing care proceedings would be shortened if detailed assessments were made before the cases went to court, according to new research from Northumbria University.

Although the Children and Families Act 2014 stipulates that the majority of care cases should be completed within 26 weeks, delays often occur due to requests for assessments being made after the court proceedings have begun. This has led to some cases lasting from 53 to 88 weeks, placing significant stress on both the children and families involved, as well as strain on their relationship with social workers.

Working with Liverpool City Council's Children's Services team and the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), researchers assessed the impact that Family Court Advisers have on the duration of court cases for care and adoption proceedings.

When Family Court Advisers worked with children and the local authority before proceedings began, the researchers found that court cases were shortened by almost three weeks in duration, reducing unnecessary delays for children in need of care.

Dr Kim Holt, Head of the Department of Social Work and Communities at Northumbria University, was approached to lead a review in Liverpool, following concerns from the Designated Family Judge, HHJ De Haas QC, regarding delays for children in court cases.

Working with colleagues from Bradford and Manchester Universities, Dr Holt analysed 26 cases in which children who had experienced long-term neglect were facing court proceedings on their future care.

All cases had previous social services involvement for parental issues including alcohol and drug misuse, domestic violence, crime, mental health and learning difficulties. Most of the children involved had been or were currently subject to child protection plans and some of their siblings had previously been removed from the family.

Eleven of the 26 cases had the support of a Family Court Adviser before the case went to court. The researchers found that when the Adviser was involved the case lasted an average of 23.5 weeks. For those in the comparator group who did not have the service of an Adviser, the average timescale was 26.1 weeks.

Dr Holt explained:

"It is essential that the focus remains on the child in cases relating to their future care, rather than the competing agendas of the adults involved who are already individually represented. The Family Court Adviser ensures that the child has an independent voice within child protection practice at the pre-proceedings stage. 

"We have found a direct link to the early involvement of Advisers to shorter care proceedings in some of the cases reviewed. This means that the timeline for the resolution of care proceedings for children who are awaiting decisions about permanency would be significantly reduced if there is a robust mechanism for the completion of detailed assessments of the child and their family prior to a case proceeding to court."

Dr Holt added:

"Social workers in Liverpool have confirmed that increased time spent with families within the pre-proceedings stage meant they felt more confident when presenting evidence in court. They also reported that the Advisers were pivotal in cases where there was a high level of risk.

"There is unequivocal support that the Advisers were able to provide a head start, with fewer requests for additional reports and more emphasis placed on the social work assessment. Given these positive findings the Ministry of Justice may wish to debate the potential value of further involvement of Family Court Advisors in the pre-proceedings stage."