Alpha BiolabsFamily Law Week Email Subscriptionimage of 4 Paper Buildings logoGarden Court1 Garden Courtsite by Zehuti

Home > News

Charity launches legal challenge to protect vulnerable children and young people

Article 39 seeks removal of ‘myth busting’ guide

Children's rights charity Article 39 is taking legal action to have removed from circulation a document published and disseminated by the Department for Education's innovation programme, amidst concerns that local authorities are being given advice that puts thousands of vulnerable children and young people at risk.

The application to launch judicial review proceedings comes after a document published by the department came to light which frames as 'myths' legal protections for children in care, care leavers, children who are in custody on remand, and children who run away and go missing.

The so-called 'myth busting' guide contains questions about different aspects of local authority duties towards vulnerable children and young people, with the charity raising concerns that much of the advice about councils' legal obligations contradicts and undermines existing law and statutory guidance.

Simpson Millar, acting on behalf of the charity, confirmed that legal action to have the document removed from circulation was underway due to fears it could lead to local authorities acting unlawfully and weaken the protections given to vulnerable children and young people.

Last year, fifty organisations and social work experts wrote to Children's Minister Nadhim Zahawi MP urging him to withdraw inaccurate parts of the document but he refused stating there had been no change to the law or government guidance.

Article 39's Director, Carolyne Willow, said:

"It is deeply regrettable that the Minister did not withdraw the document after we clearly set out the inconsistencies with the current statutory framework. This document overwrites key obligations within our children's social care system, which were crafted over many years and subject to detailed public consultations. The protections the guide presents as mythical exist in our legislation and statutory guidance because of the real needs of real children and young people.

"We are taking a risk financially with this legal challenge but it's the right thing to do. It shouldn't fall to vulnerable children and young people, many of whom are in the care of the state, to have to go to court to defend the protections Parliament and successive governments have given them."

Oliver Studdert, solicitor at Simpson Millar, said:

"The 'myth busting' guide removes important statutory safeguards which were put in place to protect some of the most vulnerable people in society. In following this guide, local authorities will be denying fundamental support and protection, set out in law, to large numbers of children and young people in need."

Article 39 is challenging parts of the guidance which claim: